You have quoted Malleus and attributed it to me. I don't know why. If you think I should recuse from this case, I will. Don't trouble yourself over that.
To clarify, I said "I support any civil disobedience *in support of BLP*." Prior to my arrival on ArbCom, the policy was described in this way: "Administrators are authorized to use any and *all means* at their disposal to ensure that every Wikipedia article is in full compliance with the letter and spirit of the biographies of living persons policy." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Footnoted_quotes#Special_enforcement_on_biographies_of_living_persons In a very real way, BLP trumps all other policies, as it ought to. Remember also that "The burden of proof is on those who wish to retain the article to demonstrate that it is compliant with every aspect of the policy." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff Cool Hand Luke On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Apoc 2400 <apoc2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thomas Dalton wrote: > > > 2010/1/21 Apoc 2400 <apoc2400 at gmail.com>: > > > Is there anyone here who can do something about this before it becomes > an > > > even bigger wheel-war? > > > > Try ArbCom. Keeping admins in check is their job. > > > > Unfortunately, at least one arbitrator is part of the group. > "Civil disobedience is often necessary." --User:Cool Hand Luke > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l