You could also ask why people work for money for encyclopedia publishers. I know some people who have worked as researchers at print encyclopedias, and they sure as hell didn't do it for the money (the pay was rubbish). It is not quite the same as volunteering for free, but the same altruistic aims are there - doing something for the love of it and because you think the end product is something worthwhile. That may feed into feelings of self-worth, but that is not the whole story. There should still be room for simply altruism that is not self-serving.
Carcharoth On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Martijn Hoekstra <martijnhoeks...@gmail.com> wrote: > To an extent this is true, but no more (or less) than saying "all > volunteers are weird". And they are. There are bound to be exceptions, > but I find that with almost every single volunteer there is either > something mentally wrong, or there is something seriously lacking in > their social life. > > I'm not really sure why this is, but I do have some ideas. One is that > people want their life to have worth. Society provides with a number > of things to do that. Having a job one is good in can provide such a > sense of worth. Having good friends you share your life with can > provide such worth. Most people do derive their sense of selfworth > from something like that. > > Some people volunteer to get a sense of self-worth. Wikipedia does > this to a great extent. The overused Jimbo quote "Here, we are polite, > thoughtful, smart, geeky people, trying only to do something which is > undoubtedly good in the world: write and give away a free > encyclopedia" shows that is exactly what we do. We want to do somthing > worthwile. Now why do we want to do that? Because we believe our lives > wouldn't be as worthwile if we didn't. > > Now I am not saying that Wikipedians, or volunteers in general don't > have good, rewarding jobs, or not enough friends, or whatever other > common mechanism for self-worth is absent in their lives, just that > they believe that their other means of generating selfworth are not > enough in some sense. Just that they have chosen a very uncommon - or > weird - way of gaining that self-worth, namely volunteering. > > That very fact, that they have chosen such a weird way to define > themselves, makes them weird. > > As a final note: Weird doesn't equal bad. We wrote one of the most > popular websites of all time. And all thanks to our weird way of > generating self-worth. > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Charles Matthews > <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote: >> David Gerard wrote: >>> This is beautiful and true, and you must watch it: >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEkF5o6KPNI >>> >>> (I have been at a pub with a trivia quiz where the table of >>> Wikipedians didn't enter because "it wouldn't be fair.") >>> >>> >> Thank God it doesn't reinforce any stereotypes. Oh, wait ... >> >> Charles >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
