Charles Matthews wrote: > The point would be no different from (say) unreferenced content: there > the distinction between "may be removed" and "must be removed" is quite > important. And there is the "right", not of the link but the editor > adding it, to have "good faith assumed": other things being equal, > assume that the link was added to help develop the encyclopedia. The problem with a phrase like "may be removed" is its implicit ambiguity. Those of us who read "may" in a potential sense expressing a possibility are offset by others who read "may" in a permissive sense.
Ec _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
