David Gerard wrote: > The article is basically not even wrong. And that's because they > really don't care, and literally just made up some shit: > > http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/16/jimmy-wales-fox-news-is-wrong-no-shakeup/ > > Sources of this type, even if owned by a large media company, need to > be taken with an extra grain of salt. > > I would say the point of the Fox article is the subtext: no one rules the WMF, ergo they would have no way to comply with legal requirements such as a take-down order. NB the subtle solecism "free reign" (for "free rein") that turns the wiki ideal on its head, and the wholely misleading suggestion that Jimbo could ever "assign projects" as man-management (other than to employees), rather than operate as a "low-level administrator" does, by building small teams.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l