On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:09 AM, stevertigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> Wikis are all about eventualistic processes. It's kind of the point. >> That said, automatic notification of people who care that a statement has >> become stale is useful. Perhaps this could set a special flag in >> watchlists? >> I'm against the idea of automatically updating content for the reason that >> it's assuming the prediction in the article about a future event is true and >> actually happened as predicted. > > That's an interesting compromise.
It's actually a refutation of your position (as were all the other posts pointing out that automatic updating is a bad idea), but if you want to call it a compromise, fair enough. :-) Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
