On 9 June 2010 11:13, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the gripping hand, limiting it to BLP's got a consensus. > Trying it on for a wider array of articles is really asking for > someone to punch you on the nose. Not recommended, but > hey, you can do it if you feel proud enough. I think that might be overstating it... My understanding was that the most recently decided-on version (which is admittedly not precisely what we're getting) was *not* based on a consensus to restrict it to BLP articles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions BLPs are quoted a few times as examples, and they're certainly expected to be a large portion of the workload of this, but none of the recent plans have explicitly aimed for such a restriction. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
