On 29/11/2010 20:18, MuZemike wrote: > Absolutely agree. There are a lot of articles that are not assessed > (though, for all intents and purposes, WikiProject assessments are not > exactly the same as stub-tagging on the actual article page itself) at > all, as well as a lot of articles that are still stub-tagged and are in > fact no longer stubs. We need to keep that in mind when assigning a > number or percentage of stubs on en.wiki, as the numbers will most > certainly be off. So does clicking "Random Article" and (gasp) judging for one's own self what is a stub produce a figure very different from 50%?
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
