Charles, All,
> Are we glad to have five new substantial articles, or embarrassed to > have persistent five stubs? So has this made things proportionately > better or worse? Discuss. Short stale articles at least openly announce that they are in a rather preliminary stage. So I'm not bothered at all about the five persistent stubs. Whereas any or all of the expanded articles may turn into one of the many long stale articles we have. Outdated, not conforming to minimal standards, POV -- (seemingly) forever lurking in the depths of our encyclopedia as no active editor or WikiProject can be bothered to care for them. Regards, Peter [[User:Pjacobi]] -- GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos. Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l