On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:57, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: > If there weren't any anti-scientology campaigners spreading the word about > Xenu, we'd still have a reason to have an article about Xenu. If there was > no > anti-Santorum campaign, we'd have no reason for the article--its entire > existence depends directly on that campaign. >
Yes, but there *is* such a campaign. If there weren't a tea party movement, we wouldn't have an article on the tea party movement. But there is. So we do. If there weren't a neologism named after Mr. Santorum, there wouldn't be an article on it. But there is. So we do. -- Tom Morris <http://tommorris.org/> Please don't print this e-mail out unless you want a hard copy of it. If you do, go ahead. I won't stop you. Nor will I waste your ink/toner with 300+ lines of completely pointless and legally unenforceable cargo cult blather about corporate confidentiality. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
