There is no difference in attribution to a vanished user than there is to any other user who has an account. I don't understand why anyone would think otherwise.
Risker On 17 August 2015 at 16:20, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 16:04, WereSpielChequers > <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Currently our default license for EN wiki is CC BY-SA 3.0, but isn't > this a > > bit odd for IP editors and vanished users? Wouldn't it make more sense if > > IP editors were licensing their edits as CC SA, and vanishing users as > part > > of vanishing were relicensing their edits as CC-SA? > > The CC-SA license doesn't exist ;-) Presumably you meant CC-0. I'd > agree with Oliver that changing this would probably be more complexity > than it's worth. > > The vanishing users thing is also a bit concerning. I agree that > attributing something to "anon-655345" is a bit silly, but equally I > don't think we can practically insist that a vanishing user is > required to relinquish their copyrights before we let them vanish. > > A. > > -- > - Andrew Gray > andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
