Ah :) I understand the question better now. There is indeed no formal relationship (at least on European level, maybe in some countries there is) - although there is probably quite some overlap in volunteers.
Lodewijk Am 16. September 2011 18:03 schrieb Yaroslav M. Blanter <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:56:27 +0200, Lodewijk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > That will depend definitely on the project. I know that on the Dutch > > Wikipedia, rijksmonumenten are generally considered to be encyclopedic > > (although in some cases collections of buildings should be put into one > > single article because they clearly belong together - for example the > > Entrepotdok buildings in Amsterdam I imagine). I can't speak for other > > language projects. > > > > Lodewijk > > > > I am not talking now about notability or other issues, I just wanted to > understand whether there is any relation to WLM2011 contest. Apparently, > there is none. It is just an English Wikipedia project not endorsed by the > central WLM organization and focusing on article writing which are not part > of the contest in 2011. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
