Well, although technically possible to print, I do not exclude the possibility that the jury might favor a GFDL-only licensed picture less than a CC BY-SA picture. It definitely makes the image less useful.
Anyway - we're bikeshedding. Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> > On 02/09/12 20:53, Michael Andersen wrote: > > Hi > > > > The idea was to have a contest where users upload pictures of monuments > with > > a free license. > > > > But some free licenses are better than others. What would happen if one > of > > the winners was a GFDL? Would it not mean that we would have to add the > > whole GFDL text to the calendar and wherever we would like to use the > > photos? > (...) > > So I think we should make as few exceptions as possible. I think licenses > > that are more free than Cc-by-sa-3.0 is ok (Cc-Zero and PD-self) but I > would > > not like GFDL for example. > > > > Cheers > > Michael / MGA73 > > Not really a problem for a calendar. You have the back side available > for that. > And it's not like saying "CC-BY-SA or compatible" would be a good move. > There are other perfectly good licenses like the Free Art License which > are "equivalent", and we should not be banning. > > We are also giving a strong signal for free licenses, even those we may > like less by not discriminating them on the contest. > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org