Hey, I actually doubt that it would be helpful to answer all of them. Going through it to find the most helpful feedback and summarize that would probably be more helpful for the evaluation. If you could link to such summary from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012/Evaluation (I hope someone can nicely layout that and make it work in the rest of the framework :) ) we could also link other evaluation resources from there.
Personally I didn't know about this page... We have too many different communication channels :) Lodewijk 2012/10/22 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> > <https://commons.wikimedia.**org/wiki/Commons:Upload_**Wizard_feedback<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback>> > seems to have many requests related to WLM. Most have probably been > archived by the bot without a reply, but it would be useful to answer the > remaining ones (or archive them if no longer relevant so that the backlog > is reduced). > Thanks, > Nemo > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.**wikimedia.org<WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/**wikilovesmonuments<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments> > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.**org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org> >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
