On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2012/4/23 Delphine Ménard <notafi...@gmail.com>: > > Top posting. > > > > This is getting a bit ridiculous. Frankly, while I see the need for > > *some* statistics, I don't see how the number of emails exchanged is > > in any kind of way relevant to the work this ombudsmen commission, for > > one. Seriously, if they solve a case with 2 emails or 200, I couldn't > > care less. Second, I understand Thomas' reluctance to skim through 600 > > emails to give a report that was not part of his mandate in the first > > place, if I am not mistaken. > > I am very surprised that it would require going through 600 emails to > find out how many cases the OC has dealt with over the past year. If > they don't have that information somewhere, then they can't have been > doing a good job. There is no way they can do their job properly > without knowing what cases they've received... > Knowing _what_ cases they have received is entirely different from keeping track of _how many_ they have received. I assume they could very easily ascertain if a given complaint is a duplicate of an already solved case, but would have to do some work to count up the previous cases. Best regards, Bence > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l