On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2012 7:27 PM, "Nathan" <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Other than in the process of enforcing telecommunications law, is >> there any way to challenge the presumed immunity of a particular >> entity under Section 230? It seems to me, as a layperson, that >> Internet Brand's role in Wikitravel has penetrated whatever imaginary >> barrier must exist since they are now firmly in control of all content >> rules, site policies and every other aspect of project management. > > Even if they have lost safe harbor protections, is there anything illegal > about the content? What do they need Section 230 protection from?
Maybe not if you're referring to a current snapshot of the project, but of course that may not always be the case. Even the failure to effectively address vandalism seems like it could put the organization at risk, if they've lost the protection afforded to service providers. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
