I agree as well. At least at short list of the main topics would help a lot.
Regards, Cornelius ---- Cornelius Kibelka @jaancornelius +49-1520-7226062 On 7 January 2013 00:30, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with Thomas, I have to admit :) > > Having a brief "in summary" of what links comprise of is common practice > and would be fabulous! > > Every second counts in this world of mass stimulation and information. :) > > Sarah > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 6, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 2013 11:06 PM, "Ziko van Dijk" <vand...@wmnederland.nl> wrote: > >> > >> I don't see a reason for this tone, and I think that everyone who is > >> interested in the reports will easily find them. > > > > The problem is, it's hard to know if you are interested in the report > > without having any idea what it contains. A short summary, or at least a > > list of contents, helps you decide whether to click on the link or not. > (If > > the report is already a fairly short summary, just include the whole > thing.) > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l