Theo10011, 22/02/2013 23:39:
There is no guaranty that a third party understands or shares the values
of the community; there is no guaranty that giving it influence over the
candidatures for five seats will serve the cause of the community. That's a
risk. I'm not to say if it should be taken or not, but we should be aware
of that risk. It sounds reasonable to engage the scrutiny of the community
when such risks are about to be taken.
Again, the alternative would be WMF or the board itself appointing someone
without due process. Would that be more agreeable to this alternative?
Not really, there are many alternatives. One of them is a NomCom which
works... how? no idea.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
