Le 2013-06-04 19:25, George Herbert a écrit :
On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
<psychosl...@culture-libre.org> wrote:
Isn't it because trademark is based on the completly irrelevant and
irrealistic willing to have an unilateral despotic control on some
symbol, branded as "image protection", using ego/narcissistic
fallacies to argue, threat and coercion to impose its observance?
What, like how the Foundation trademarks our logos, so that random
scammers cannot confuse people into thinking they are looking at a
free, open, community site?
The Foundation uses Trademark, Linus Torvalds went to some effort to
get the Linux trademark as a community intellectual property value,
there are numerous examples.
As I say there [1], I just don't agree, and it just my opinion. Enough
said.
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trademark_practices_discussion#We_can_go_without_trademark
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
