It is a fair question.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gerard" <dger...@gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Let's have the courage to sit down and talk
aboutVisualEditor
On 31 July 2013 10:59, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com> wrote:
de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
hasn't.)
Hi David, i am editing on dewp and enwp. I consider myself an experienced
editor, but not an expert. I did not participate voting in dewp, but i
like
to try ve from time to time. Beeing a software developper I fully support
eriks arguments before. Imo pragmatic and flexible decisions help such
development a lot, just like Erik explained.
Certainly. However, it's the obvious question to ask, and a curious
question to spend several paragraphs not answering.
Erik, James - how did de:wp convinced you when en:wp hasn't?
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
