_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Rui (and list) there is a myth about "articles that are sacrosanct" -
which is not to say that there aren't such articles, though the examples
you gave don't stand up to much scrutiny. It would be useful to conduct
some research on the whole corpus to evaluate this hypothesis and give
some upper and lower bounds for the populaiton, and to establish some
sample lists for qualitative examination.
- [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real encyclopa... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real ... Fred Bauder
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real ... Denny Vrandečić
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a r... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will neve... Richard Farmbrough
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be... Laura Hale
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will neve... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be... Denny Vrandečić
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be... Peter Southwood
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real ... Mark
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a real ... Asaf Bartov
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be a r... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will never be... David Gerard
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will neve... Rui Correia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Why the WP will... George Herbert