An authoritative and easy to used resource giving of the effect or our everyday 
activities is essential if voters are to know enough to influence politics.

I cant find any entries on Wikipedia to match this. To some extent I blame 
Wikipedia's over emphasis on peer review and official sources. The [Carbon 
footprint] entry is probably counter-productive as it implies that the quoted 
sources are more reliable than they are. I fear some of these sources are 
incorrect, hide their proprietary information or are influenced by politics 
(i.e. government departments).

What I would like to see are lots of entries on Wikipedia like:

[the carbon footprint of beef]
[the carbon footprint of air travel]
[the carbon footprint of a new house]

& etc.

Wikipedia is the right place for such information to be presented.

See more of my criticism here: 
http://www.brusselsblog.co.uk/is-wikipedia-too-credentialist/

Geoff Beacon


P.S. I do make a modest monthly contribution to the Wikimedia foundation.


-- 
  Geoff Beacon
  geoffbea...@sent.com

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to