* Michael Maggs wrote: >On 3 Jan 2014, at 14:22, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoe...@gmx.net> wrote: >> I find it a bit worrying that Commons makes little effort to distinguish >> between "copyright on this sculpture" and "copyright on this photograph >> of a sculpture". It would seem preferable if there was suitable meta >> data recording the reason why these media have been restored. > >That distinction is made very carefully in Commons policies, and has >been for many years.. If you have examples of some images that have been >tagged incorrectly, please say.
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oeuvre_de_Gustav_Vigeland_(4846416424).jpg> was the first I clicked and it does not seem to have any structured in- dication of a PD status. I take it some of the other images are in the `PD-author` category, so perhaps not all metadata has been updated for the images, hence my question how the list was obtained. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>