Hi David,

We were selling video editing softwares at that time, and that's what I
remebered for the MPEG-4 royalties. But MPEG LA would do the license thing
case by case, maybe my information is not correct now.

I just found that MPEG LA has announced in 2010 that it will not charge
royalties from Internet video that is free to users from the lifetime of
the license, maybe WMF projects can fit the requirement? I think it needs
the legal team to do the investigation.

The MPEG LA press release for free Internet Video:
http://www.mpegla.com/Lists/MPEG%20LA%20News%20List/Attachments/74/n-10-08-26.pdf

Regards,
Ted Chien
-- Sent from my HTC New One
2014/1/17 下午11:29 於 "David Gerard" <dger...@gmail.com> 寫道:

> On 17 January 2014 15:03, Ted Chien <hsiangtai.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From my knowledge when I was working as an engineer in the multimedia
> > software company back in 2006, if there's no transcoding to MP* formats,
> no
> > patent fee is required. So if you upload MP4 files then download them
> > without any transcoding it should be fine (correct me if I'm wrong). We'd
> > only been charged by MPEG LA for encoding the MPEG-4 video at that time.
>
>
>
> So we'd be fine transcoding *from* MPEG4?
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to