On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater degree > than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK > "superinjunctions"?
First, WMF operates globally, and while I took pains as general counsel, just as the WMF legal team does now, to limit exposure around the world, it is a mistake to suppose that jurisdictional protections are invariably impenetrable. See my discussion here on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqQOvxyj66w . Second, the ECJ decision can be used to go after editors individually, or organized WMF-affiliated groups. --Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
