I think if you are going to be releasing images or video you would be better using a Creative Commons license or similar. The RPL (like the GPL it's based on) is significantly more designed for source code and programs and the requirements make media much harder to reuse.
James Alexander Legal and Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Uh, wait. Please answer the question clearly and unambiguously. What > exact > > license will the proposed contributions be under? > > On Jul 18, 2014 2:06 PM, "Milos Rancic" <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that the best one is Reciprocal Public License [1]. What do you > think? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Public_License > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
