It should. As I recall, the idea came from their work. :-) (Don't quote me, but pretty sure I'm right.)
*Philippe Beaudette * \\ Director, Community Advocacy \\ Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. T: 1-415-839-6885 x6643 | phili...@wikimedia.org | : @Philippewiki <https://twitter.com/Philippewiki> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:58 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Looks like Extension:MoodBar aka FeedbackDashboard, which was enabled on > enwiki for some time. > Am 24.11.2014 22:26 schrieb "svetlana" <svetl...@fastmail.com.au>: > > > Think I can run an instance of https://github.com/mozilla/fjord on Labs > > and have various Wikimedia projects (Wikis and Chapters) point to it in > > their sidebar. A universal "Leave Feedback" link. > > > > It would take people to a page similar to > > https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback, with an appropriate > disclaimer: > > "If you need help or have a problem with Firefox, please visit Firefox > > Support." We could be able to customize it for each project to fit our > > needs. (Include aggressive pointers to OTRS queues and village pumps for > > each project, as appropriate). > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- > > svetlana > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, at 08:19, svetlana wrote: > > > I maintain that I would love to have a formal universal feedback > channel > > for Chapters work. It has to be drama-free, but transparent, and not > > moderated. > > > > > > Feedback is occasionally not negative, and may contain thorough project > > ideas. > > > > > > -- > > > svetlana > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 18:03, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > > > Hoi, > > > > As there is this constant call for more paper work for chapters, it > > has to > > > > be understood that this is exactly what kills the productivity of > > chapters. > > > > There are always more people with their opinion why this that or the > > other > > > > is amiss. They all have their arguments why they think they are right > > and > > > > consequently contribute to the noise level that is already way too > > high. > > > > > > > > If anything we should look for ways of appreciating the effect of > > chapters > > > > that does not make them beholden to every John Dick AND Harry and at > > the > > > > same time gives them equal space to move as effectively as the > > Wikimedia > > > > Foundation itself. > > > > Thanks, > > > > GerardM > > > > > > > > On 23 November 2014 at 23:02, svetlana <svetl...@fastmail.com.au> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > To clarify: I would like to see a more strong mechanism for review > of > > > > > Chapters work. This includes thorough feedback channels about how > > Chapters > > > > > communicate, how they spend their funding. Including means to > > dissolve a > > > > > Chapter if a large chunk of people believes it is not working well > > (such > > > > > as, providing inadequate support to the Wikimedia movement). > > > > > > > > > > This feedback channel is probably not here, but I feel this list > > could be > > > > > an appropriate place to discuss how the above could be implemented. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 08:28, svetlana wrote: > > > > > > I disagree, the question raised is relevant to the Wikimedia > > movement as > > > > > a whole. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 02:37, Austin Hair wrote: > > > > > > > Fae, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please do not drag this list into whatever trouble you've found > > > > > > > yourself in on another. Wikimedia-l is neither a court of > > appeals for > > > > > > > Wikimedia-related lists nor a bullhorn for your personal > > grievances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Austin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Darcy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am concerned at what appears to be deliberate suppression > of > > > > > > > > questions raising governance related issues from the > wikimedia > > UK > > > > > > > > email list. The email below is an example. The list was > always > > > > > > > > intended to be independent of the UK chapter, though one of > the > > > > > > > > moderators is one of your employees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please confirm that neither you, nor your > employees, > > are > > > > > > > > manipulating this public list to your political advantage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Fae > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > > > > > From: Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Date: 18 November 2014 at 19:24 > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Welcome ro D'Arcy Myers > > > > > > > > To: UK Wikimedia mailing list < > > wikimediau...@lists.wikimedia.org> > > > > > > > > Cc: geni...@gmail.com, Harry Mitchell <hjmitch...@ymail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be nice to hear from the board how this was > discussed > > before > > > > > > > > offering the interim position. After all, in the several > > interviews I > > > > > > > > took part in for WMUK staff, pretty much the first basic > > question was > > > > > > > > along the lines of 'have you ever edited Wikipedia?' as a way > > of > > > > > > > > assessing what the candidate knows about Wikimedia; so I can > > not > > > > > > > > believe this would come as a surprise considering how > > sensitive the > > > > > > > > board is on COI and its perception by our community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fae > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 November 2014 19:13, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 18 November 2014 18:55, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> [[user:Dcfmyers]] has no other edits. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> whoops missed a couple of deleted ones 2 edits to [[George > > More > > > > > O'Ferrall]]. A direct copy and paste of > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/527160/ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> In fairness copyright is a pretty blameless error for new > > editors > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > >> geni > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > >> Wikimedia UK mailing list > > > > > > > >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > > > > > > > >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > > > > > > >> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
