Lodewijk,

See the following category on the WMF site:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Category:Job_Descriptions. This
contains descriptions of all of the positions hired for since 2007-ish,
though it is definitely not necessarily reflective of the role that these
positions have in the organizational structure today.

I would agree that a refreshed organizational chart should be provided to
the community one of these days by the WMF to reflect the structural
changes under the new ED.


On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Actually, not so much a personel org chart, but rather a general
> description what the function titles mean (ED, Director, Manager, Chief,
> Head etc.), which supposedly should be much more stable and therefore
> easier to grasp? For someone not embedded in US company nomenclature this
> is all quite confusing and the general description articles on enwiki are
> not very helpful either...
>
> Lodewijk
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:47 AM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote:
>
> > Lodewijk wrote:
> > >In Wikimedian spirit, i would like to take the opportunity to ask the
> > >silly question: is the structure of what all titles in Wikimedia mean,
> > >described somewhere? Because to be honest, I'm getting all confused
> about
> > >who ranks what in the structure of directors, vice presidents, chiefs,
> > >heads, managers and seniors. I was, silly me, always under the
> impression
> > >that a Vice President was basically just below the ED - on the C-level.
> > >
> > >I was looking for this info to be perhaps linked from the staff &
> > >contractors page on wmfwiki, but i don't seem to be able to find it.
> Could
> > >someone enlighten, and perhaps add it somewhere if not there yet? I
> recall
> > >having asked this question also a few years back and that a list was
> made,
> > >but I can't find it any longer...
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I think you're talking about an org chart here. The Wikimedia Foundation
> > used to have one, but they're kind of annoying to maintain and any public
> > version basically fell apart years ago. Last I saw, it was a tool on
> Labs,
> > but it's been through several iterations. The page histories (of the
> > article and the template) on wikimediafoundation.org will have
> references
> > to it if you go back a few years.
> >
> > Re: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Template:Staff_and_contractors
> >
> > The template page includes a table of contents, which is not yet updated
> > to reflect this new department, but is still really helpful for
> > understanding the organization's structure nonetheless. Bonus: that page
> > also auto-expands the sections for faster and easier searching. Viewing
> > the template page instead of the article is a nice little hack for now.
> >
> > MZMcBride
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to