This site
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Chief_Executive_Officer_(CEO)/Salary
States that a US American CEO salary would be from 70k up to 420k a year,
for Ngo 83k less. You are asking where and why the wmf executive director
is in this range Lodewijk?

Rupert
On May 31, 2016 10:21, "Lodewijk" <lodew...@effeietsanders.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I haven't seen an answer to my questions. Could you please
> acknowledge the receipt of the question if you're investigating? Or could
> you just say it is a ridiculous question and that you refuse to answer, if
> you think so? From the more elaborate answer on the Signpost questions, I
> understand that the role continues to this day - which makes it probably
> more relevant.
>
> Please don't retreat in silence again.
>
> Lodewijk
>
> 2016-05-25 14:39 GMT+02:00 Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org>:
>
> > Thanks Greg for the responses.
> >
> > As for the ED team, that answers part of my question. That Sue was
> > appointed as special advisor, was indeed public knowledge - but for what
> > duration was that? And was that a full time position (or anything near
> full
> > time), given that her compensation was as high as that of the ED herself?
> > People suggested that this included compensation for earlier years - was
> > that the case? That would explain again a bit more.
> >
> > Also part of the question was why the raise was so steep - was this
> simply
> > matching the reality of the current job market, or was there something
> else
> > behind it (i.e. a bonus mechanism etc).
> >
> > It would be great if you could clarify! Thanks!
> >
> > Lodewijk
> >
> > 2016-05-25 12:45 GMT+02:00 John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Gregory Varnum <gvar...@wikimedia.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Greetings,
> >> >
> >> > Thank you to everyone for your questions and thoughts regarding the
> >> Wikimedia Foundation's Form 990.
> >> >
> >> > Regarding Lodewijk's first question about the legal services
> (totalling
> >> US$1.7M) which were conducted by Jones Day (page 61 - Part VII): As our
> >> global reach has grown over time, we felt it was important to strengthen
> >> the trademark portfolio and solidify the protection of Wikimedia’s marks
> >> globally. In December 2013, we began working with Jones Day on our
> global
> >> trademark filings, registrations, and oppositions. During the 2014-2015
> >> fiscal year we filed 1,500+ new trademark applications for 35 different
> >> trademarks in 100+ countries. A significant portion of the legal
> services
> >> expenses in 2014-2015 went toward the mandatory government trademark
> >> application filing fees.
> >> >
> >> > These new trademark applications contained expanded coverage and
> >> revised descriptions to ensure better protection of Wikimedia's marks
> and
> >> projects, including countries where readership was growing through
> targeted
> >> programs or distribution (such as Wikipedia Zero and mobile readership).
> >> Going forward, we anticipate (and are beginning to realize) a decrease
> in
> >> trademark expenses year over year, now that we have this initial
> foundation
> >> is in place. This investment immediately benefits Wikimedia and its
> >> communities by ensuring that our trademark portfolio reflects the
> maturity
> >> and breadth of the Wikimedia movement, and protects us against certain
> >> forms of infringement or misuse.
> >>
> >> Hi Gregory,
> >> Just to confirm, the stated US$1.7M stated on page p.61 includes
> >> filing and other fees paid by Jones Day to relevant government bodies
> >> around the world?
> >> If so, any chance you can separate it into such fees paid *through*
> >> Jones Day, vs the consultation fees of Jones Day.
> >> You say it was a 'significant portion', but that is very vague
> >> terminology, meaning very different things to different people; it
> >> would be nice to have a ball park figure.
> >>
> >> Also there was a USD ~5.2 M investment in Europe listed on p. 35 as
> >> not being program services.  I didn't see any reference to it in the
> >> FAQ; apologies if I missed it (It would be lovely if the source
> >> document was posted on meta for easier navigation, etc.).  Could we
> >> have a little more info about this line item?
> >>
> >> --
> >> John Vandenberg
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to