Well, that would technically violate the terms as stated in the template. The result of those buttons would be: "By Taxiarchos228 (Own work) [FAL], via Wikimedia Commons"
According to the detailed description it has to be (I think): "By Wladyslaw Sojka, www.sojka.photo" (from the description it's not even 100% clear to me whether the license has to be mentioned). I'm not sure whether this kind of 'trapping' is part of the bad practices, but given the stories I read so far, I wouldn't be surprised. Lodewijk 2017-03-07 13:16 GMT+01:00 Jonatan Svensson Glad <gladjona...@outlook.com>: > Also, the MediaViewer offers HTML and plain text attribution, if you press > the right icons. > > Jonatan Svensson Glad > Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons > > > On 7 Mar 2017, at 13:01, "wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org" < > wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > Re: a second commons, prevent cease and desist business > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
