I quite agree that Phabricator is not suitable for these discussions. Perhaps Tim would like to say where and how discussions between the Community and Foundation staff about the need for, and desirability of, projects like this should be held. After all, we all want projects to go ahead on the basis of Community input, don't we?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 13/06/17 20:28, Gergő Tisza wrote: > > Now that we have ascertained (again) that wikimedia-l is a poor channel > > for focused discussions about tech proposals, can we move this to > > Phabricator? > > I filed https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168218 > > On 14/06/17 12:12, Risker wrote: > > I see your point, Gergo, but in reality Phabricator is an even worse > > channel to discuss projects that are, essentially, social issues. > > I'd rather you didn't discuss social issues on Phabricator. I filed > the task for the technical part of the project. > > -- Tim Starling > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
