There may be a way to do it on another project designed for the purpose, but 
that cannot be English Wikipedia, and I doubt that any project that allows 
anonymous editing could manage it credibly. Oral tradition would at least have 
to be sourced to the teller, and would have to be recorded by a reliable and 
identified recorder, who can be held responsible for their due diligence. This 
would not be an easy thing for a crowdsourced project, but anything less would 
be like a magnet for everything we don't want.
Cheers,
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of 
Chandres Wikipedia
Sent: Wednesday, 04 October 2017 9:25 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Strategy] September 28: Strategy update - Final 
draft of movement direction and endorsement process (#25)

I do not have a perfect solution to introduce oral traditions in Wikipedia 
today, but I’m convince that we need to find a way to do it.

Just to give you an illustration:

Today ,a significative amount of African topics in the Wikipedia in French rely 
only on the work of only few French historian. Without saying they are not 
honest, I find difficult to consider that there words have really so more value 
than the words of the Ancient of the African tribes.

We know for sure than oral tradition will include bias, but do not forget that 
the «  traditional western historian work » are not exempt of bias too.

Charles

PS: IMHO, I find offensive the way you define oral traditions, but it may be 
caused by a misconception from my part. 

These are the definition I use for urban legend and oral tradition, very 
different each other I think.
urban <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/urban#English> legend 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/legend#English> (plural urban legends 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/urban_legends#English>)
A widely circulated story <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/story> that is untrue 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/untrue> or apocryphal 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/apocryphal>, often having elements of humour 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/humour> or horror 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/horror>.
oral <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/oral#English> tradition 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tradition#English> (countable 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#countable> and uncountable 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#uncountable>, plural oral 
traditions <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/oral_traditions#English>)
Cultural <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/culture> material transmitted 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/transmit> orally from one generation 
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generation> to another.





> Le 4 oct. 2017 à 21:11, Yaroslav Blanter <ymb...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> You might be right, and the goal is indeed to differentiate between 
> them. I just do not see how it could be implemented in practice. A 
> legend is a legend, be it urban or not.
> 
> Cheers
> Yaroslav
> 
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Chandres Wikipedia 
> <chandres...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> to Wikipedia. They might still be a separate WMF project, which is 
>>> likely to be problematic (since it is really difficult to 
>>> differentiate between say folk tales and the oral traditions which 
>>> state that Earth is flat and that all US presidents report to the 
>>> Zionist Occupational Government),
>> but
>>> 
>> 
>> For me, your definition of oral tradition is the one of « urban legend ».
>> TO my understanding, oral tradition refer to culture where the 
>> History of the tribes/nation/people is transmit only by a spoken way 
>> and never put on paper.  Am I wrong?
>> 
>> charles
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ 
>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ 
>> wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to