Hello, On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:49 AM Zack McCune <zmcc...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > From more than 319 comments, representing 150 individual contributors and > 63 affiliates, we assessed 6 major themes in feedback: > > The benchmark is completely twisted to make opposition impossible: * Support and Opposition are measured by different metrics: Support is measured by "reviewing affiliates support" and opposition by "informed user opposition". * Support percentage is set at 38% for reviewing affiliates (24 affiliates?), it would be roughly 19% for reached affiliates and 15% of total affiliates. * Opposition percentage is set at 0.6% for informed (reached) users, it would be 38% of reviewing users. On the other hand: * Opposition from reviewing affiliates is 9.5%. * Support from reviewing users is 13% (vs 38% oppose) * Support from reached users is around 0.2% (vs 0.6% oppose). The support and opposition metrics seem to be cherry-picked to force a strong support result, but that is not the case when comparable metrics are used. I agree that a proper RFC should be created, possibly at the initiative of the community, to get a clearer result. Best, MarioGom _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
