There is a problem of incompatibility of examples of AI like ChatGPT. 1st: Wikipedia is not primary source, the references are important. In ChatGPT there are statements but not references to support the statements.
2nd: Bias. In Wikipedia all positions for a problem must be indicated. ChatGPT is not able to describe the different positions. It takes generally only one. 3rd: disambiguation. Examples like ChatGPT don't process well the disambiguation. It means that the system has a weak AI. It looks that in case of disambiguation, it takes only one meaning. 4th: neutral point of view. Examples like ChatGPT don't give a neutral answer. Frequently they are trained to take a specific answer. However I personally consider that investigate in AI makes sense because AI is doing a lot of progress and Wikimedia projects can benefit. But ChatGPT is a bad example for Wikimedia projects. Kind regards On Fri, 30 Dec 2022, 01:09 Victoria Coleman, <vstavridoucole...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone. I have seen some of the reactions to the narratives generated > by Chat GPT. There is an obvious question (to me at least) as to whether a > Wikipedia chat bot would be a legitimate UI for some users. To that end, I > would have hoped that it would have been developed by the WMF but the > Foundation has historically massively underinvested in AI. That said, and > assuming that GPT Open source licensing is compatible with the movement > norms, should the WMF include that UI in the product? > > My other question is around the corpus that Open AI is using to train the > bot. It is creating very fluid narratives that are massively false in many > cases. Are they training on Wikipedia? Something else? > > And to my earlier question, if GPT were to be trained on Wikipedia > exclusively would that help abate the false narratives? > > This is a significant matter for the community and seeing us step to it > would be very encouraging. > > Best regards, > > Victoria Coleman > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines > at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/CYPO3PEMM4FIWPNL6MRTORHZXVTS2VNN/ > To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/QVRH5GBHLHHAIPNLLMKQGEEROM3VKNKF/ To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org