https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_artificial_intelligence
Two most popular open source AIs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimi_(AI) https://www.kimi.ai/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepSeek_(AI) https://chat.deepseek.com/sign_in I linked to the web versions of these, but it is possible to download local copies of either of these and run them on consumer / home computers without reporting back to the mothership. If you want to browse biases over time of 50+ different popular AIs, browse Internet Archive's Ask me Twice project https://wayback-api.archive.org/services/amt/ On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 11:54 AM Alaexis via Wikimedia-l < [email protected]> wrote: > We already have open-source Qwen models (built by Alibaba) running on > the WMF hardware ( > https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Machine_Learning/LiftWing/Large_Language_Models#Available_Models) > which has made compute available to many tool builders, me included. > > The distinction should be between open weights we can host and adapt vs > closed APIs. Myself I've used open-source models built both by Chinese and > US labs (Qwen, GLM, GPT-OSS) for wiki tools and I think we should evaluate > a model's fit per task according to our standards. Any model would reflect > the biases <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepSeek_(AI)#Censorship> of > its training set and process. > > Alex > > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2026 at 18:12, Gerard Meijssen via Wikimedia-l < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hoi, >> One of the cornerstones of our MediaWiki software stack is that it is >> freely licensed. Another is that our content is freely licensed. Not as >> explicit is that our software and content are available to everyone >> wherever they are. >> >> Artificial Intelligence is not freely licensed, it is not globally >> available. Many of the models are obviously biased. The USAmerican models >> can be and are not globally available and can not be changed. >> >> I am told that the Chinese DeepSeek can be run on our own hardware and >> more relevant its functionality can be tweaked. That is in my opinion more >> in line with the use of functionality that restricts our communities. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> also >> https://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2026/11/unlike-complete-mediawiki-software.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines >> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >> Public archives at >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/YTJVSMUF34FC77KR52L35NLCUKIHSOD6/ >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines > at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/3C6HEG53RYG6XCHWJDWXFFLWUP6V6ZIB/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Lane Rasberry user:bluerasberry 🟦🌀💙🌀🟦
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/YNOL6MOHF4UZROMA6U53ZKA6MZNP7G6E/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
