Yeah - I don't imaging we'll be holding anyone to a particular external standard like FA or GA, but rather to intrinsic standards like "most improved" or "most new stubs" or "most challenging topic" that kind of thing. And yes, there is not a long lead time for this, but then again, that's not the end of the world. We've already have two major institutions offer to donate a prize for the comp - and no, it's not something from their collection :-)
Best, Liam, [[witty lama]] wittylama.com/blog Peace, love & metadata On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laug...@gmail.com > wrote: > Also, I thought any longer than a week and you might have trouble > holding people's attention to the task. I was originally thinking to > just make it a weekend! > > Brianna > > > 2009/6/16 Brianna Laugher <brianna.laug...@gmail.com>: > > 2009/6/16 YellowMonkey <blnguyen2...@gmail.com>: > >> Isn't that a tad short? Nobody, eg, writes a FA that quickly (generally > >> speaking) > > > > Well, the intention is not to do the edits and get it through FA > > approval in a week. As an entry to this challenge you'd generally just > > be submitting your edits. My thinking was that the judges will be able > > to see what you're trying to achieve, regardless of whether or not it > > does end up getting FA status. > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > cheers > > Brianna > > > > > > -- > > They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: > > http://modernthings.org/ > > > > > > -- > They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: > http://modernthings.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
