Eu sou o usuário numero 23... Me lembra aquele filme kkkk
2013/1/3 Raylton P. Sousa <raylton.so...@gmail.com> > Uffa... Até que enfim... \o/ > > > 2013/1/3 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> > >> CAR..O!!!! CONSEGUIMOS!!! >> >> TÁ CRIADA, ALELUIA!!! >> >> Alias, graças ao nossos esforços, eles criaram outras WikiVoyages de >> balde, Uhaaa!!!! >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> >> Date: 3 January 2013 18:28 >> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikivoyage project launch/migration update >> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org> >> >> >> Hoi, >> The Portuguese Wikivoyage has been created. :) >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> >> On 12 November 2012 22:31, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton < >> rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > So you're telling me there's files, but you will not import because no >> one >> > of the Portuguese speakers helped in the cleaning process? Then I'll >> > have to start >> > from scratch (something that already exists), denying the existence of a >> > community and the previous project and I still have to go through >> > various bureaucratic >> > processes, so that maybe one day the project (that already exists) come >> > into >> > existence? >> > >> > More than that, we have to manually import the WikiTravel, and as we >> > have no import >> > tool, we will not be able to bring together the history, so authorship >> is >> > not properly credited, breaking the license, something which we can not >> do. >> > Soon, we will have to find a way to give credit to those who wrote, or >> even >> > write from scratch... so pretty... >> > >> > I really wanted to understand the reason for not bringing all the >> languages >> > of Wikitravel ... everything was under a free license, it would give a >> > lot more work? More work than the work to make 2000 new articles in pt? >> > >> > Tomorrow I restart the project, and maybe in 6 years it will come to >> have >> > the 2000 articles again. For today I have to cancel activities for the >> next >> > semester that could increase project visibility, after all it does not >> > exist >> > . >> > >> > >> > I know that Wikipedia is The priority, but for the love of god! >> > >> > >> > On 12 November 2012 15:33, MF-Warburg <mfwarb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > 2012/11/12 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > > > Roland Unger, 12/11/2012 07:46: >> > > > >> > > > Hi folks, >> > > >> >> > > >> the Wikivoyage e.V. got the xml files of more language versions, I >> > > >> think also for es, fi, hu, ja, pl, pt, ro and zh from user Wrh2. >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Where are they? Again, please publish them. >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > I can only underline this. It would be quite necessary to know how >> many >> > > pages existed there and how active the project actually was (There is >> no >> > > reason for the language committee to make an exception for all these >> > > languages IN BULK if some have actually no current interest from >> users). >> > > The XML dumps can of course be imported to Incubator in the case that >> an >> > > own subdomain is not immediately created. >> > > Note that some pages for a wikivoyage in Spanish have already been >> > started >> > > on Incubator, as well as this request/discussion: >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikivoyage_Spanish >> > > >> > > Besides, can these old wikis from which the xml files were taken >> still be >> > > accessed? At least it is not http://pt.wikivoyage-old.org/ . >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> But there were no users who helped us to check to contents. >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Wikivoyage/New_language_**versions< >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikivoyage/New_language_versions>is >> now >> > > on Meta, by the way. >> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/New_wikis_importers< >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_wikis_importers>/might/ want to >> help >> > > doing the XML import, depending on how much >> > > > pre-emptive cleanup is actually needed; you can try asking them. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Indeed ;-) >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list >> > > wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org >> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton >> > rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com >> > +55 11 97 97 18 884 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list >> > wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l >> >> >> >> -- >> Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton >> rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com >> +55 11 97 97 18 884 >> _______________________________________________ >> WikimediaBR-l mailing list >> WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l >> >> >
_______________________________________________ WikimediaBR-l mailing list WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
