Esta semana mesmo localizamos um outro "preposto" da nossa velha amiga editora, aquela mesma do WikiSampa antigo, lembra? http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/Bmontesanti
Jo 2013/5/2 Everton Zanella Alvarenga <t...@wikimedia.org> > I really would like to see such analysis for other Wikipedias where we > have a much more limited number of volunteers working to combat spam. > > I remember of a WikiMeeting in São Paulo (one of the biggest so far, I > think in 2012 when global development folks visited here) where some very > commited wikipedians where trying to explain non addicted wikipedians on > the importance of removing those spam links added consciously by paid > people. > > Spam is a real issue and I am afraid it can somehow damage some > communities health leaving them overloaded, hence less tolerant to new > editors. Maybe when this happen to the English Wikipedia then it will > become a real issue. > > Tom > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Sumana Harihareswara < > suma...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> http://blog.ironholds.org/?p=31 >> >> Ironholds looked at a sample of users with one or more edits to enwiki >> who were blocked in 2006-2012. The short version: spam is a bigger >> problem than vandalism or sockpuppetry, and the spam problem is growing. >> > > > -- > Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) > "A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful > than a life spent doing nothing." > > _______________________________________________ > WikimediaBR-l mailing list > WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l > >
_______________________________________________ WikimediaBR-l mailing list WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
