Yes, I apologize for a number of misunderstandings that made me accuse you without justification.
That is something Charles has never done for his slanders about me. I think, I shall still consult the Federal Supervision of Foundations. Hartwig From: wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Péron Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:01 PM To: Wikimedians in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] photo on the bj-institute website Hi Thomas, May be apologies are more appropriate, because of your insults about me. Regards Ludovic 2013/10/21 Hartwig Thomas <hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch> I am not yet satisfied. It appears that Ludovic was more justified, than I originally anticipated. But his manner of communicating smelled very much like a campaign to me. It reminds me, that WMCH promised a contribution to the Digitale Allmend and then "forgot" all about it for two years. Or of Charles Andrès spreading lies about the Digitization Expert Group not answering questions for months, which I had answered within an hour. (Admittedly, the answer was short but pertinent, as the question was not very specific.) I do not understand, why WMCH considers it necessary to campaign against some activist of the free and open culture movement. Maybe I could understand better, how money contributions can be "forgotten", if WMCH published a yearly financial report and the minutes of the meeting of the board detailing financial decisions. If those are not made public within a reasonable amount of time, maybe I should ask my questions from the Federal Supervision of Foundations (Eidgenössische Stiftungsaufsicht http://www.edi.admin.ch/esv/). Hartwig -----Original Message----- From: wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Matina Hämmerli Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:48 PM To: wikimediach-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediach-l] photo on the bj-institute website Dear all The story behind this picture on our website is very simple. Previous we had the link in the caption (description of a picture). A few days back I implemented a new news-module in our website. This doesn't allow Links in the caption. I didn't want to make cryptic remarks, they don't look so nice. With the comment Wiki Commons I wanted to give access to the source. As I could find out, that it is not possible to find the source by inserting Wiki Commons and a keyword like Herbarium or Reprostation. I should have checked it out. What I would like to inspire is, that in cases like this we can contact the particular person (in this case Bruno or me) and make them aware of the deficiency. Otherwise we won't encourage people to use Creative Commons - if they risk to be in the pillory. I replaced now the photograph with one from our own photos. A message to Hartwig: please stay in our association - we need good people! I am sure we will overcome all misunderstandings! Best regards Matina ___ Matina Hämmerli Board Member Wikimedia CH Asssociation for the Advancement of Free Knowledge Mobile +41 79 272 95 50 <tel:%2B41%2079%20272%2095%2050> Skype matinahaemmerli matina.haemme...@wikimedia.ch / www.wikimedia.ch _______________________________________________ http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website Wikimediach-l mailing list https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l _______________________________________________ http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website Wikimediach-l mailing list https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
_______________________________________________ http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website Wikimediach-l mailing list https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l