Yes, I choose many important factors that was available in wikimedia stats,
The formula was derived by me but as a past student of economics i tried to
do my best, basically i marked each factor on the scale of 100 so that no
factor alone may affect the whole survey.

Thank you

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ravishankar <ravidre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mayur,
>
> Interesting analysis. Thanks for the hard work.
>
> Is there any academic reference based on which the formula was arrived or
> is it empirical?
>
> One possible indicator for a Wikipedia's quality may be offline activisim /
> organizing as it indicates the community's rapport which is very vital for
> overall quality control. Things like meetups, releasing CD etc.,
>
> Ravi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

Reply via email to