The tool only picks up en articles currently.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:20 PM, jeph <jephp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > @Srikant, > Add > 'Category:Articles_created_or_expanded_during_Women's_History_Month_(India)_-_2014' > to the article & it will get picked up by the script. Its a hidden category. > > @Pratik Lahoti > Edit count is far from a perfect measure of editor contribution :-). It is > just one of many metrics we could use. As such it also depends on an > editors style, small/frequent edits to few/big edits. Sorting the list by > edit count may not present the right picture. Would love to hear what you > think. > > Jeph > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan < > srik.r...@wikimedia.in> wrote: > >> Excellent work. >> Just pointing out that there were several articles which were edited >> outside the two Edit-a-thons. These articles are not being counted by the >> script. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:07 PM, A. Mani <a.mani....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Parul <sri.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > India has a lot of successful women scientists who have made a mark in >>> their >>> > respective fields. However, it is unfortunate that these women still >>> do not >>> > have an existence on Wikipedia. Read this blog post to know a little >>> more. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > We are organizing a Women Scientists edit-a-thon tomorrow and day >>> after. >>> > Join us by editing as many articles as possible during these the two >>> days. >>> > Apart from creating articles, you could also help us by correcting or >>> > expanding existing ones. Adding names to the existing list of >>> scientists >>> > would go a long way too. >>> >>> >>> >>> What criteria (relative academic accomplishments) is being used for >>> qualifying as a "women scientist"? >>> Some days ago, I saw some entries for fresh people with a couple of >>> publications (it was part of an earlier round of editing). >>> One cannot really go by the few awards (politicized) and such. >>> >>> If that is the criteria, then I know at least 95 women who would fit >>> in. If I set the cut off point at 5 years in research, then the number >>> would be 60 - 72+ (I am not sure ). >>> >>> If the criteria is 100pp of publication in refereed international >>> journals or 10 years in research or some high impact work (requires >>> peer review), then the number would be much less. >>> >>> ps. I don't want an article on myself as I have enough publicity :) >>> >>> >>> Best >>> >>> A. Mani >>> >>> >>> >>> A. Mani >>> [Last_Name. First_Name Format] >>> CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS >>> HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in >>> Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list >>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Srikanth Ramakrishnan >> Treasurer, >> Wikimedia Chapter [India] >> >> Donate to the Wikimedia India Chapter >> today<http://wiki.wikimedia.in/Donations> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list >> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
