On 23 May 2011 16:56,  <iain.macdon...@wikinewsie.org> wrote:
> While I'm on the subject:
> In the last half-hour or so The Telegraph, Sun and Daily Mail have all named
> Giggs following a question in Parliament; the Sun need no longer worry about
> fighting the injunction.
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8531175/Ryan-Giggs-named-as-Premier-League-footballer-in-Twitter-injunction-row.html
>
> http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3596356/Ryan-Giggs-is-Twitter-Prem-star.html
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389841/Ryan-Giggs-named-Commons-footballer-injunction-preventing-details-affair-Imogen-Thomas.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
>
> Iain
>

That just moves the problem onto TSE & ELP and they who must not be
named who outed TSE on twitter. Then there is ETK waiting in the
wings.

1 down 51 still in place and at least one of those 51 looks like a
pretty valid attempt to deal with blackmail.

Fun.


-- 
geni

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to