Or to break it down; it is not a policy *for *volunteers. But a policy for
staff interacting with volunteers.

Right?

Tom

On 18 February 2012 00:21, Chris Keating <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> The housing association has a "volunteer policy", and the application
>> pack was 34 pages in length (I think that has changed). They have a lot of
>> volunteering effort. But there is a real divide between those are
>> "official" volunteers and those who contribute to the community in
>> different ways. What bugs me is some will get awards, get their picture
>> taken, get invited to special events and others will just on with it.
>>
>> Wikipedia started as a volunteer effort. Wikimedia UK wanted to label
>> some people as volunteers, since those volunteers will take take part
>> (online and offline we assume) at workshops, competitions, hack days, GLAM
>> events etc etc run by the organization.
>
>
> I think I understand, though my brain may be frazzled by spending all of
> today debating the finer points of Wikimedia movement fundraising. And I
> empathise, because I've often found myself spending more energy on my
> "spare time" commitments (including this one, sometimes) than I do on my
> day job.
>
> But really I think this policy -
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_Policy - has the opposite effect
> to what you're worried about.
>
> What it says, in summary, is:
> * The most important thing to our organisation is the impact of people who
> are contributing their time voluntarily
> * Staff exist to support the work of those volunteers (not replace it)
> * As part of the appraisals or our staff, we're going to talk about not
> only how they are supporting volunteers, but whether there is anything that
> they're doing that volunteers can and are willing to do, even if this is a
> bit less convenient for the staff member concerned.
>
> Really, we are going to great lengths to find staff who "get it" about the
> Wikimedia movement in general and this in particular. It's probably the
> biggest single thing we care about when recruiting staff.
>
> So I hope this goes some way to addressing your concern. Happy to talk
> about it at a meetup sometime (and I'm sure other board members would be as
> well)
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to