Does that make sense though? With an account called "Starwarrior", say,
there is no way of knowing who made the edit either.

Andreas

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I thought it was just a matter of accountability. With a role account,
> there is no way of knowing who actually made an edit.
> On Apr 29, 2012 2:18 AM, "Richard Symonds" <chasemew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Me and a close friend were having a rather heated debate tonight on the
>> topic of role accounts, and I am hoping you (as a community) can answer my
>> question:
>>
>> Why do we ban role accounts?
>>
>> I was of the understanding that it was something to do with
>> copyright/legal issues, but it's been a few years since I passed RfA, and
>> I'm struggling to remember the arguments that I once remembered so well. I
>> had a trawl through all the appropriate pages on meta and enwp, and
>> although I could find out that role accounts *were* blocked, I couldn't
>> see the justification behind it mentioned anywhere
>>
>> I'm not disagreeing with the policy, but I was wondering if anyone knew
>> the reasoning behind it - and why said reasoning isn't included in the
>> policy pages?
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Chase
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to