On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1 August 2012 01:52, Andrew West <andrewcw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 31 July 2012 13:17, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Predictably, the story is starting to spread: >>> >>> http://news.google.co.uk/news/story?gl=uk&pz=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=wikimedia+uk&ncl=drcm1dj39Jz4CfMo-tJUD6HkAFEPM&cf=all&scoring=d >> >> And equally predictably: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_van_Haeften > > There are some notability concerns there... I haven't tagged the > article, but I've left a note on the talk page. > > I've also noticed the issue is now getting international coverage: > > http://www.actualitte.com/acteurs-numeriques/le-president-de-wikimedia-uk-banni-pour-violation-des-regles-de-wikipedia-35722.htm
Ugh, I think it has several aspects wrong, like asserting that Jimbo also banned/agreed with the ban of Ashley from en.wp, rather than banning Ashley from his talk page before the ArbCom decision. > I have no idea what that site is, and don't speak French, but it shows > up on Google News. It doesnt look very notable, with 156 hits across all Wikipedias https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=%22Actualitte.com%22+site%3Awikipedia.org -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
