Thanks for the suggestions and views about whether/what sort of submission WMUK should make to the consultation on the CDB.
There isn't a 'response' to comment on at the moment as we agreed as a Board on Thursday night that WMUK should go ahead and make a submission to the consultation. The Board agreed that we should keep the WMUK response brief, more to raise a flag about the Bill needing reconsideration, rather than a full blown detailed response of the type Open Rights Group is likely to submit. I will only get time to work on a response towards the end of next week &/ weekend while being conscious of the deadline of 23rd August. If anyone would like to kick-start things prior to then, that would be great. Thanks, Joscelyn -----Original Message----- From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of wikimediauk-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: 04 August 2012 13:01 To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 85, Issue 26 Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikimediauk-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org You can reach the person managing the list at wikimediauk-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Request from Open Rights Group (Martin Poulter) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:14:30 +0100 From: Martin Poulter <infob...@gmail.com> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list <wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Request from Open Rights Group Message-ID: <CABCnYt38=vc7cBLBP0qneBBa-L9u=weu1pec31-vtjpsuap...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Asking people to comment on something they haven't seen would indeed be unreasonable. Fortunately, Jon did something entirely different: inviting those interested to get in touch with the person who will write the response. Why not take up the suggestion? On 3 August 2012 20:41, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 August 2012 13:43, Jon Davies <jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: >> I sent this around a while back. >> The ORG would like our support. >> >> Joscelyn Upendram is preparing a simple reponse on our behalf, if >> anyone wants to offer her ideas contact her directly >> >> Jon Davies. > > Its unreasonable to expect people to comment without at least a rough > idea of what response is being prepared. > > > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org -- Dr Martin L Poulter Wikipedia contributor http://enwp.org/User:MartinPoulter Wikimedia UK contributor http://uk.wikimedia.org/ Musician http://myspace.com/comapilot Person http://infobomb.org/ ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Wikimediauk-l mailing list Wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 85, Issue 26 ********************************************* _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org