Because the blog post response to The Daily Telegraph article wrote that "“The Board is united in the view that this decision does not affect his role as a Trustee of the charity."
Then again my conclusion was only an inference based on a sequence of events. I take it you still stand by that comment? WH. On 6 August 2012 05:10, Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5 Aug 2012, at 18:34, WilliamH wrote: > > I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position > before the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did > grasp it *after* he stepped down. > > > {{citation needed}}. I'm curious to know why you think this? > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
