Hii All,

I read the letter by author Philip Roth about *Reliable Sources* on
Wikipedia and his unrest about the article on his book* 'The Human Stain' *a
while ago and just saw this discussion initiated here.
Here's the Open letter written by Roth :
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-wikipedia.html?mobify=0

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19527797
>
> Was anyone approached to give the other side of the story? The article
> lacks any explanation of our policy on reliable sources. It sounds like our
> policy was followed correctly - the author's statement was accepted as
> reliable only one it was published - but the BBC don't seem to have asked
> what the policy is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to