And of course the link to
http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-sockpuppet-investigation-largest-network-history-wiki-pr/-
that makes great reading!
Doug


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Stevie Benton <
stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:

> Thanks for sharing that link Edward. I think most of the coverage that
> I've seen has been pretty fair actually. I'm slowly putting together a list
> at
> https://wiki.wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Reports/2013/October#UK_press_coverage_.28and_coverage_of_UK_projects_.26_activities.29
>  for
> those interested. (I'm aware the section heading may need changing this
> month.)
>
> The CIPR President Elect has made some pretty robust comments about this
> story, too. They can be seen at
> http://www.prweek.com/article/1217351/new-wikipedia-editing-furore-provokes-cipr-ire
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Stevie
>
>
> On 22 October 2013 14:51, Doug Weller <dougwel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So that's what the paragraph in the i was about - it didn't mention paid
>> editors. Glad to see an explanation.
>> Doug
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Edward Hands <edwar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Knew about Antandrus, but not Raul's Laws.  Thanks.
>>>
>>> From today's Guardian, "  Wikipedia cracks down on 'paid advocacy
>>> editing and sockpuppetry'  ":
>>>
>>> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/22/wikipedia-ban-sock-puppet-pr
>>>
>>> Only six comments so far, if anyone wants to weigh in.
>>>
>>> Edward Hands
>>> (Edwardx)
>>>
>>>  Sorry about that.  Thanks for spotting that Charles.
>>> On 22 Oct 2013 13:05, "Charles Matthews" <
>>> charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22 October 2013 12:35, Stevie Benton <stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>  I've just encountered a Wikipedia essay from a user called
>>>>> Antandrus. It's from 2006/7 or so initially but much of it still holds
>>>>> true.
>>>>>
>>>>>  It may be familiar to you but thought you might like it, too -
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  for the thing itself, rather than the talk page. The grand-daddy of
>>>> such lists is of course
>>>>
>>>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Raul%27s_laws
>>>>
>>>>  Charles
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Doug Weller
>> http://www.ramtops.co.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Stevie Benton
> Communications Organiser
> Wikimedia UK+44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173
> @StevieBenton
>
> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and 
> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered 
> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. 
> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia 
> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who 
> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
>
> *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over 
> Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>


-- 
Doug Weller
http://www.ramtops.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to