But Gordo, how would you expect the wider volunteer community to amend the Articles other than by debating and voting on a resolution at an AGM (or EGM)?
Volunteers who are not members, for whatever reason, can still make their views known, even if they have no legal entitlement to vote. I'd be interested in any ideas to increase participation, of course. -- Doug > On 12 May 2016 at 10:18 Gordon Joly <gordon.j...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > On 11/05/16 23:34, Rex X wrote: > > > > To that end, if you feel that there are specific issues to be mentioned or > > specific wording that would be an improvement to our Articles, then please > > do > > suggest them - preferably on-wiki so that we can have a broad discussion, > > and > > you have my promise that I'll raise them with the Board with a view to an > > AGM > > resolution, if needed. > > > Yes, a resolution at an AGM, as has happened in the past. > > Those Articles that are a legal entity, for which the members of charity > have a right to amend? And not the wider volunteer community? > > Gordo > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
