On 8 July 2016 at 01:51, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It can be argued that the current copyright obfuscates the general public's > access to the report. How so? > I do feel that any single email from us would be promptly ignored as there > probably is a large volume of emails. It may be prudent to either start a > petition (for the Parliament) or ask a few MPs to raise the copyright issue > in the Parliament. Petitioning for what? The report is already under the CC-by compatible Open Government Licence 3.0 > First of, the websites terms and conditions do not explicitly release the > works under a free license.[1] No, the report's licence is on the pages of the report itself. > Moreover it mentions BSkyB, BBC and ITN as copyright holders of some of the > documents. Any migration to Wikisource must filter out such content. Are your referring to inclusions in the report, or to other content on the inquiry website? > Lastly there are a number of now declassified documents that provide vital > evidence to reinforce the reports findings, these too need to be freely > licensed. AIUI, they are (albeit with understandable redactions). -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
